Click on an image to enlarge it in your browser window.
What is striking about this letter from David Treagust to 'Andy' is that he is claiming that Reuben Makoi is the sole Trustee for the school, yet in June of this same year - four months earlier, David Treagust supposedly witnessed a letter appointing five new Trustees. You can find the letter here: A Letter Purporting to be From a Meeting of the Board of Trustees in Which New Trustees Were Appointed - 7th June 1995. How is it then if Makoi appointed five new Trustees in June, plus Makoi himself and also the Archbishops of Sudan and Egypt (making eight Trustees in total - one over the legal limit) that Treagust is claiming that Makoi is the only remaining Trustee still in October? Clearly and very obviously there was something wrong with the legality of the hand-written scrap of a note that was forged earlier in June. It is also very clear that Treagust himself knew of the illegality of their 'back of a cigarette packet' type of a approach to making legal documents.
Treagust asks that Andy try to get Makoi to sign a new document in front of a solicitor. Not an easy task in the bush of southern Sudan. Why was this not done when they were supposedly meeting in London? A much easier task.
The other pages are amateurish attempts by Nabil Adib, the lawyer who was co-opted into the gang who were stealing the school, to provide a range of different flavours of legal documents so that Makoi could pick the one he liked the most - assuming Andy ever found him. Providing different forms to choose from ('take your pick') is absurd and not conducive to presenting a sense of professionalism and integrity to the standing of the lawyer.